Ae.
Bois DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
a es Ao ,
ys
i oe
7
RaW teh
ey
BOE ' ) SUDECTION ME NAVAL RECORDS
BOARD POP, CUR RS tee /t
701 ยง, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR3450-14
1 Oct 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552).
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
30 September 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated
4 August 2014, a copy of which is attached.
@
ie)
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient t
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
)
Oo
to WH
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is jmportant to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NR3450-14
ay 4
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to iemanieaee the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
BEMIS
oo f 4hd ON (oe i LL
@OBERT J.~O'NELLL
Executive Director
Enclosure: HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dtd 4 Aug 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3980 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 21 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0261 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dtd 1 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5103 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and , applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR5103-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9044 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 duly 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6705 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7569 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3788 13
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5219 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 5420 MMEA dated 29 August 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5210 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considere@ the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 5420 MMEA dated 29 August 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5822 13
RR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 12 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.